Kristen Bell & Dax Shepard's 'No Kids' Campaign, Part 2

Kristen Bell & Dax Shepard's 'No Kids' Campaign, Part 2

New parents Kristen Bell and Dax Shepard visit Access Hollywood Live and discuss leading the charge against paparazzi taking unauthorized photos of stars’ children. What is their specific goal? How do they believe they can get the paparazzi to stop taking unapproved pictures of celebrities’ kids?

We have been in the fight a long time. How does it fight I have been in the fight but she went out and got it done and Halle led us all getting it done with the law and it's changing my kids lives and I'm so, so grateful. Reporter: Relieved. Right. I'm relieved. Yes. Of course. If right there on the red carpet. Oscars talking about the effort of Kristen bell and Zack shepherd and they are here the no kids policy campaign before we get in the law because of Jennifer up there with Halle getting involved with that. What is the specific goal? Could you put it in two or 3 sentences. Yes. We believe that the if the paparrazi were no longer getting paid they would stop hunting. Wouldn't do it as a hobby. Vote with your dollars. I think we are about to see a huge paradigm shift what people want to consume in entertainment media. This nasty under belly hasn't really been exposed. Sometimes people complain about the paparrazi but we wanted specifically relate it to how the children are affected and go are we really all come place net this. We believe that if they were to get rid of that he willment of the magazine that they wouldn't really suffer any kind of dip in sales. I think it's a part of the product so they naturally feel like that's -- Reporter: Would you change let them follow you yourselves the adult in the bathroom. Written policy never take a photo of my child. I urge most people to follow me into the bathroom. I pay 5 to 10 buck if you just take a look for a quick second. I about auto 5 in your pocket. You talk about the paparrazi what they do is they will yell. Just stop give to it me I'll leave you alone the rest of the day. They blackmail. They blackmail you all the time then they say you set that up with me or you allowed me to do that. It's like wait a minute. To parents I know had a choice between being followed all day or giving one look up to the camera and then being left alone. They say if you let me punch you in the face once with your guard down we don't have to fight all day long. Which is. It's ridiculous. Can we stop this. The law has been passed. Anything changed. I don't know that we'll be able to get around the first amendment no. 1 for a reason. And we personally believe that the first amendment is important facet of a good democracy we don't undermine it. That's why we are not telling you change the constitution we are saying consumer please donconsumer please don't buy these. Consumer the is the one. All consumer think about the back story of what goes into it. Not just a cute picture. Wanted to know pink slime in our meat. We want to know when bad behavior exists and the first amendment is powerful and it's wonderful and we are not trying to shut it down. I personally just wish that the second aement amendment don't be a jerk. Don't believe in out log smoking but like the consumer to know guess what it gives you cancer. All right so look here's the law. Anti-paparrazi law. Any person who intentionally harasses the child of any other person because of that person's employment just means because you are famous that's why you are taking pictures of the kid. They can be imprison in a county jail not exceeding a year and fine year and fine of 10,000 dollars. Now harass means knowing and willful conduct directed at a specific child seriously alarms annoystor mentor terrorizes the child. Then enough problem. Loop hole that. Serve no, sir legitimate purpose. When you hear the picture it doesn't serve legitimate purpose. Open a picture for the legitimate purpose and say accuse can I war between 2 parents and shot the mom walking the child down the street. Oh,the street. Oh. That picture supports the story about the custody war. Then it serves legitimate purpose. We need to attack the demand side. Appealing to the consumer who we know wants to be informed. Everyone wants to be an informed consumer. So because this law is wonderful and I'm so gritful to Halle and Jen for working on it but there are some tricky bits to it and we wanted to open up the conversation with the people that actually have the power. You are smart to go to the publishers. "Access Hollywood". Television show. Smart to good to the today show. Smart to go to everybody because act of transmission publishing recording of the image if you broadcast it, there is no violation. So you are totally right. For a long time we felt so fed up with the fact that entertainment outlet and the subject of them were adversary and because we felt like we were on opposite teams for so long. Doesn't make any sense. Entertainment media is to be fun. We all get to do the best job in the world and we should be celebrating that not fighting with each other. So let's just agree to have a little bit better conduct and leave the kids alone. As you just brought up in this law what makes that loop hole possible is that it's under the guise of news. Right. That these children are part of a news story which gives photographers the right to follow them. If you live in suburbia and 10 men follow your kid every day. Harassment no first amendment they go to jail. This is under the guise of it being news. In the case where people call up and set up an interaction in a park, that's not news. That's a performance. We can agree it's not news. And children that are not public figure in my opinion are not news. How could they be news? They are not with anyone until introduced and made relevant. They make them news story. When I saw Halle talking about the divorce and I saw them not only stalking taking pictures but yelling things about the divorce and she's holding the child in her arms I'm like. Yell at us it's a miracle I'm not in jail. They are full objective is to instigate a reaction. Who is doing it well who is doing it well and who are the great offenders? Who in the media is reputable and good in your eyes and who is not. Well. The list is so fluid right now thank god it's really been a domino effect on the big shocker where people were I think among the fires come out. Had a whole baby section. Us weekly agreeus weekly agreed to not publish. Which was great. Jared was the first to jump on board. Perez Hilton. This morning and we have been appealing to him as a father. Boston herald. TMZ. We are in discussion with TMZ. Have you met with Harvey. I haven't personally I know people who have and we have opened the discussion. Thinks peer pressure. Yes. It's good. Absolutely. TMZ shouldn't be hunting children. It's a gross gross business. It really is. You can knot put a prison and target on the child's head. Nothing cute about them going around the cubicle with. Really hard. It's an exhibit it's gross. It's vile if anything if they don't do it, if they won't be one of the good guy then we will appeal to the consumer until the number go down. Because I talk a lot. Okay. That's the truth. Pretty much. Anyone needs a great brand of ear plug. Right there up next is Kristen and Zack and joined by Steve and Kristen of the photo agency. Do they change their tactic. Find out after Look up. Right there. My